Question: A term often used for people who are deeply concerned with the environment is "green". Compare a "green" person's attitude toward consumption with that of a person who is not "green".
As the exacerbation of environment is realized by more people, "green" has been a hot word. Green food, green material and green travelling have become quite popular. Nevertheless, not all the people who say "green" really have "green mind". Here, I just compare a "green" person's attitude toward consumption with that of a person who is not "green" to show their difference. A "green" person will choose the merchandise which can help protect environment but not just buy anything natural. The pretended "green" person is the one who is saying that he or she never eat anything not green while chewing rare species animals which are purely wild. A person who holds real "green mind" will deal the offal during consumption properly to prevent polluting. Those who litter about never consider how environment affected negatively if they do so. What they only care is how to keep themselves "green". Saving resources and energy as much as possible and sparing realizing the sustainable consumption is set as goal by "green" persons. However, wasting will not be considered as a behavior guilty. Conclusively, a "green" is consuming greenly while a person who is not green is consuming the "green" environment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
A few problems with language use are in the paragraph, such as "exacerbation of environment."
Thanks!
You've chosen a challenging topic. I think the example you shown is not that obvious. If you could bring your own container when you go 'dapao' your dinner....you are definitely a deep green one.
Green is a profound word if you look into it... I think green is all about thinking a the consequences such as damages to the environment...
Post a Comment